Model Comparison

GPT-4o vs GPT-4 Turbo

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. GPT-4o is 3.4x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

GPT-4o outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while GPT-4 Turbo is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Mon Apr 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-4o costs less

For input processing, GPT-4o ($2.50/1M tokens) is 4.0x cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo ($10.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4o ($10.00/1M tokens) is 3.0x cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo ($30.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4 Turbo is more expensive than GPT-4o.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Apr 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAzure
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$30.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. GPT-4o can generate longer responses up to 16,384 tokens, while GPT-4 Turbo is limited to 4,096 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input128,000 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
Mon Apr 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT-4 Turbo does not.

GPT-4o can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4 Turbo

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4 Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o was released on 2024-08-06, while GPT-4 Turbo was released on 2024-04-09.

GPT-4o is 4 months newer than GPT-4 Turbo.

GPT-4o

Aug 6, 2024

1.7 years ago

3mo newer
GPT-4 Turbo

Apr 9, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 Turbo has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while GPT-4o's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4 Turbo's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT-4o's cutoff date.

GPT-4o

GPT-4 Turbo

Dec 2023

Provider Availability

GPT-4o is available from Azure, OpenAI. GPT-4 Turbo is available from Azure, OpenAI.

GPT-4o

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

GPT-4 Turbo

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (70.1% vs 48.0%)
Higher MMLU score (86.5% vs 85.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4o
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4o vs GPT-4 Turbo

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. GPT-4o is made by OpenAI and GPT-4 Turbo is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-4o scores AI2D: 94.2%, DocVQA: 92.8%, ChartQA: 85.7%, MMLU: 85.7%, CharXiv-D: 85.3%. GPT-4 Turbo scores MGSM: 88.5%, HumanEval: 87.1%, MMLU: 86.5%, DROP: 86.0%, MATH: 72.6%.
GPT-4o is 4.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4o costs $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output via azure. GPT-4 Turbo costs $10.00/M input and $30.00/M output via azure.
GPT-4o supports 128K tokens and GPT-4 Turbo supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include input pricing ($2.50 vs $10.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.