Model Comparison

GPT-4o vs Kimi-k1.5

Kimi-k1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

GPT-4o outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMMU), while Kimi-k1.5 is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2024, IFEval, MathVista, MMLU).

Kimi-k1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Apr 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Apr 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAzure
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4o specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only GPT-4o specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Apr 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both GPT-4o and Kimi-k1.5 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi-k1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

Kimi-k1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o was released on 2024-08-06, while Kimi-k1.5 was released on 2025-01-20.

Kimi-k1.5 is 6 months newer than GPT-4o.

GPT-4o

Aug 6, 2024

1.7 years ago

Kimi-k1.5

Jan 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher MMMU score (72.2% vs 70.0%)
Moonshot AI
Higher AIME 2024 score (77.5% vs 13.1%)
Higher IFEval score (87.2% vs 81.0%)
Higher MathVista score (74.9% vs 61.4%)
Higher MMLU score (87.4% vs 85.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4o vs Kimi-k1.5

Kimi-k1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4o is made by OpenAI and Kimi-k1.5 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-4o scores AI2D: 94.2%, DocVQA: 92.8%, ChartQA: 85.7%, MMLU: 85.7%, CharXiv-D: 85.3%. Kimi-k1.5 scores MATH-500: 96.2%, CLUEWSC: 91.4%, C-Eval: 88.3%, MMLU: 87.4%, IFEval: 87.2%.
GPT-4o supports 128K tokens and Kimi-k1.5 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
GPT-4o is developed by OpenAI and Kimi-k1.5 is developed by Moonshot AI.