Model Comparison

GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Llama 4 Maverick is 15.8x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

GPT-4o outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMMU-Pro), while Llama 4 Maverick is better at 5 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, MathVista, MMLU-Pro, MMMU).

Llama 4 Maverick shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue May 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

For input processing, GPT-4o ($2.50/1M tokens) is 14.7x more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick ($0.17/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4o ($10.00/1M tokens) is 16.7x more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4o is more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue May 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAzure
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick
Input tokens$0.17
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Maverick accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4o's 128,000 tokens. Llama 4 Maverick can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while GPT-4o is limited to 16,384 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Tue May 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both GPT-4o and Llama 4 Maverick support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Maverick

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4o is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Maverick uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o was released on 2024-08-06, while Llama 4 Maverick was released on 2025-04-05.

Llama 4 Maverick is 8 months newer than GPT-4o.

GPT-4o

Aug 6, 2024

1.8 years ago

Llama 4 Maverick

Apr 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT-4o is available from Azure, OpenAI. Llama 4 Maverick is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Lambda, Groq, Fireworks, Together, Sambanova.

GPT-4o

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Llama 4 Maverick

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.17/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.17/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.85/1M
lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.88/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.85/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $0.63/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.79/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Higher GPQA score (70.1% vs 69.8%)
Higher MMLU score (85.7% vs 85.5%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (59.9% vs 59.6%)
Meta
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher ChartQA score (90.0% vs 85.7%)
Higher DocVQA score (94.4% vs 92.8%)
Higher MathVista score (73.7% vs 61.4%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (80.5% vs 74.7%)
Higher MMMU score (73.4% vs 72.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Maverick.

Which is better, GPT-4o or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. GPT-4o is made by OpenAI and Llama 4 Maverick is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-4o compare to Llama 4 Maverick in benchmarks?

GPT-4o scores AI2D: 94.2%, DocVQA: 92.8%, ChartQA: 85.7%, MMLU: 85.7%, CharXiv-D: 85.3%. Llama 4 Maverick scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 92.3%, ChartQA: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.5%, MMLU-Pro: 80.5%.

Is GPT-4o cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is 14.7x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4o costs $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output via azure. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.17/M input and $0.60/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4o and Llama 4 Maverick?

GPT-4o supports 128K tokens and Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4o and Llama 4 Maverick?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($2.50 vs $0.17/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4o and Llama 4 Maverick?

GPT-4o is developed by OpenAI and Llama 4 Maverick is developed by Meta.