Model Comparison

GPT-4o mini vs GPT-4o

GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4o mini is 16.7x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

GPT-4o mini outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT-4o is better at 5 benchmarks (GPQA, MathVista, MMLU, MMMU, SWE-Bench Verified).

GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Apr 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-4o mini costs less

For input processing, GPT-4o mini ($0.15/1M tokens) is 16.7x cheaper than GPT-4o ($2.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4o mini ($0.60/1M tokens) is 16.7x cheaper than GPT-4o ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4o is more expensive than GPT-4o mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Apr 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerAzure
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 16,384 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Mon Apr 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both GPT-4o mini and GPT-4o support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-4o mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-4o mini

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18, while GPT-4o was released on 2024-08-06.

GPT-4o is 1 month newer than GPT-4o mini.

GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

1.8 years ago

GPT-4o

Aug 6, 2024

1.7 years ago

2w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4o mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while GPT-4o's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4o mini's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT-4o's cutoff date.

GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

GPT-4o

Provider Availability

GPT-4o mini is available from Azure. GPT-4o is available from Azure, OpenAI.

GPT-4o mini

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

GPT-4o

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (70.1% vs 40.2%)
Higher MathVista score (61.4% vs 56.7%)
Higher MMLU score (85.7% vs 82.0%)
Higher MMMU score (72.2% vs 59.4%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (33.2% vs 8.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
GPT-4o

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4o mini vs GPT-4o

GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4o mini is made by OpenAI and GPT-4o is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-4o mini scores HumanEval: 87.2%, MGSM: 87.0%, MMLU: 82.0%, DROP: 79.7%, MATH: 70.2%. GPT-4o scores AI2D: 94.2%, DocVQA: 92.8%, ChartQA: 85.7%, MMLU: 85.7%, CharXiv-D: 85.3%.
GPT-4o mini is 16.7x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via azure. GPT-4o costs $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output via azure.
GPT-4o mini supports 128K tokens and GPT-4o supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include input pricing ($0.15 vs $2.50/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.