Model Comparison

GPT-4o mini vs Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Llama 4 Scout is 1.9x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

GPT-4o mini outperforms in 2 benchmarks (MATH, MMLU), while Llama 4 Scout is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MathVista, MGSM, MMMU).

Llama 4 Scout shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Scout costs less

For input processing, GPT-4o mini ($0.15/1M tokens) is 1.9x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4o mini ($0.60/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4o mini is more expensive than Llama 4 Scout.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerAzure
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input tokens$0.08
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4o mini's 128,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout can generate longer responses up to 10,000,000 tokens, while GPT-4o mini is limited to 16,384 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both GPT-4o mini and Llama 4 Scout support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-4o mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4o mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4o mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

Llama 4 Scout is 9 months newer than GPT-4o mini.

GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

1.9 years ago

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4o mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4o mini's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date.

GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

Llama 4 Scout

—

Provider Availability

GPT-4o mini is available from Azure. Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together.

GPT-4o mini

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Llama 4 Scout

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.34/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.59/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Higher MATH score (70.2% vs 50.3%)
Higher MMLU score (82.0% vs 79.6%)
Meta
Larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (57.2% vs 40.2%)
Higher MathVista score (70.7% vs 56.7%)
Higher MGSM score (90.6% vs 87.0%)
Higher MMMU score (69.4% vs 59.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Meta
Llama 4 Scout

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4o mini vs Llama 4 Scout.

Which is better, GPT-4o mini or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. GPT-4o mini is made by OpenAI and Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-4o mini compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

GPT-4o mini scores HumanEval: 87.2%, MGSM: 87.0%, MMLU: 82.0%, DROP: 79.7%, MATH: 70.2%. Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%.

Is GPT-4o mini cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is 1.9x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via azure. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4o mini and Llama 4 Scout?

GPT-4o mini supports 128K tokens and Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4o mini and Llama 4 Scout?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 10.0M), input pricing ($0.15 vs $0.08/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4o mini and Llama 4 Scout?

GPT-4o mini is developed by OpenAI and Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta.