Model Comparison

GPT-5 vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

GPT-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

GPT-5 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU, MMMU), while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Apr 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Apr 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerOpenAI
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-5 specifies input context (400,000 tokens). Only GPT-5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-5
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Apr 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both GPT-5 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5 was released on 2025-08-07, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct was released on 2025-06-20.

GPT-5 is 2 months newer than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct.

GPT-5

Aug 7, 2025

8 months ago

1mo newer
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Jun 20, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-09-30, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-10-01.

GPT-5 has more recent training data (up to 2024-09-30), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (2023-10-01).

GPT-5

Sep 2024

11 mo newer
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Oct 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (400,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (85.7% vs 46.1%)
Higher MATH score (84.7% vs 69.4%)
Higher MMLU score (92.5% vs 80.5%)
Higher MMMU score (84.2% vs 62.5%)
Mistral AI
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5 vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

GPT-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-5 is made by OpenAI and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-5 scores SWE-Lancer (IC-Diamond subset): 100.0%, COLLIE: 99.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 96.7%, OpenAI-MRCR: 2 needle 128k: 95.2%, AIME 2025: 94.6%. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.9%, AI2D: 92.9%, HumanEval Plus: 92.9%, ChartQA: 87.4%, IF: 84.8%.
GPT-5 supports 400K tokens and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GPT-5 is developed by OpenAI and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.