Model Comparison

GPT-5 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

GPT-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 7.1x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

GPT-5 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Tau2 Airline, Tau2 Retail, Tau2 Telecom), while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue May 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking costs less

For input processing, GPT-5 ($1.25/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($1.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5 is more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Tue May 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

GPT-5

Input tokens$1.25

Output tokens$10.00

Best providerOpenAI

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Input tokens$0.15

Output tokens$1.50

Best providerNovita

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5 accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's 65,536 tokens. GPT-5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is limited to 65,536 tokens.

GPT-5

Input400,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Input65,536 tokens

Output65,536 tokens

Tue May 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking does not.

GPT-5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5 was released on 2025-08-07, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking was released on 2025-09-10.

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 1 month newer than GPT-5.

GPT-5

Aug 7, 2025

9 months ago

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Sep 10, 2025

8 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-09-30, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5's training data extends to 2024-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's cutoff date.

GPT-5

Sep 2024

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

—

Provider Availability

GPT-5 is available from OpenAI. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is available from Novita.

GPT-5

OpenAI

Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

GPT-5

View details

OpenAI

Larger context window (400,000 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Higher AIME 2025 score (94.6% vs 87.8%)

Higher GPQA score (85.7% vs 77.2%)

Higher Tau2 Airline score (62.6% vs 60.5%)

Higher Tau2 Retail score (81.1% vs 67.8%)

Higher Tau2 Telecom score (96.7% vs 43.9%)

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	GPT-5	Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.

Which is better, GPT-5 or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

GPT-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-5 is made by OpenAI and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-5 compare to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking in benchmarks?

GPT-5 scores SWE-Lancer (IC-Diamond subset): 100.0%, COLLIE: 99.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 96.7%, OpenAI-MRCR: 2 needle 128k: 95.2%, AIME 2025: 94.6%. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking scores MMLU-Redux: 92.5%, IFEval: 88.9%, AIME 2025: 87.8%, WritingBench: 84.6%, MMLU-Pro: 82.7%.

Is GPT-5 cheaper than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 8.3x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5 costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via openai. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking costs $0.15/M input and $1.50/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

GPT-5 supports 400K tokens and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking supports 66K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Key differences include context window (400K vs 66K), input pricing ($1.25 vs $0.15/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

GPT-5 is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.