Model Comparison

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini vs Qwen3 32B

Qwen3 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 32B is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).

Qwen3 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 32B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen3 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 32B does not.

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini was released on 2025-11-12, while Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29.

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini is 7 months newer than Qwen3 32B.

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini

Nov 12, 2025

5 months ago

6mo newer
Qwen3 32B

Apr 29, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2025 score (72.9% vs 42.1%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.1 Codex Mini vs Qwen3 32B

Qwen3 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-5.1 Codex Mini is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini scores AIME 2025: 42.1%. Qwen3 32B scores Arena Hard: 93.8%, AIME 2024: 81.4%, LiveBench: 74.9%, MultiLF: 73.0%, AIME 2025: 72.9%.
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 32B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.