Model Comparison

GPT-5.1 Thinking vs QwQ-32B

GPT-5.1 Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GPT-5.1 Thinking outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while QwQ-32B is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5.1 Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Thinking
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-5.1 Thinking specifies input context (400,000 tokens). Only GPT-5.1 Thinking specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Thinking
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-5.1 Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.

GPT-5.1 Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.1 Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.1 Thinking is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.1 Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.1 Thinking was released on 2025-11-12, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

GPT-5.1 Thinking is 8 months newer than QwQ-32B.

GPT-5.1 Thinking

Nov 12, 2025

5 months ago

8mo newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while GPT-5.1 Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT-5.1 Thinking's cutoff date.

GPT-5.1 Thinking

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (400,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (88.1% vs 65.2%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

QwQ-32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.1 Thinking vs QwQ-32B

GPT-5.1 Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-5.1 Thinking is made by OpenAI and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-5.1 Thinking scores Tau2 Telecom: 95.6%, AIME 2025: 94.0%, BrowseComp Long Context 128k: 90.0%, GPQA: 88.1%, MMMU: 85.4%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.
GPT-5.1 Thinking supports 400K tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GPT-5.1 Thinking is developed by OpenAI and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.