GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Comparison

Comparing GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

GPT-5.2 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMLU, MMMU-Pro, VideoMMMU), while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.2 ($1.75/1M tokens) is 7.0x more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ($0.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.2 ($14.00/1M tokens) is 9.3x more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ($1.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.2 is more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Input tokens$1.75
Output tokens$14.00
Best providerOpenAI
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GPT-5.2's 400,000 tokens. GPT-5.2 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is limited to 65,536 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.2 was released on 2025-12-11, while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-03-03.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 3 months newer than GPT-5.2.

GPT-5.2

Dec 11, 2025

3 months ago

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Mar 3, 2026

2 weeks ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.2 has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-08-25, while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a cutoff of 2025-01-31.

GPT-5.2 has more recent training data (up to 2025-08-25), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (2025-01-31).

GPT-5.2

Aug 2025

7 mo newer
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

Provider Availability

GPT-5.2 is available from OpenAI. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is available from Google. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

GPT-5.2

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $14.00/1M

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher CharXiv-R score (82.1% vs 73.2%)
Higher GPQA score (92.4% vs 86.9%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (34.5% vs 16.0%)
Higher MMMLU score (89.6% vs 88.9%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (79.5% vs 76.8%)
Higher VideoMMMU score (85.9% vs 84.8%)
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite