Model Comparison

GPT-5.2 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

GPT-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Flash is 32.1x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

GPT-5.2 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (AIME 2025, BrowseComp, GPQA, HMMT 2025, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.2 ($1.75/1M tokens) is 17.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.2 ($14.00/1M tokens) is 46.7x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.2 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Input tokens$1.75
Output tokens$14.00
Best providerOpenAI
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.2 accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's 256,000 tokens. GPT-5.2 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-5.2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.

GPT-5.2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.2 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.2 was released on 2025-12-11, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.

MiMo-V2-Flash is 0 month newer than GPT-5.2.

GPT-5.2

Dec 11, 2025

3 months ago

MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

3 months ago

5d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-08-25, while MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.2's training data extends to 2025-08-25, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date.

GPT-5.2

Aug 2025

MiMo-V2-Flash

—

Provider Availability

GPT-5.2 is available from OpenAI. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

GPT-5.2

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $14.00/1M

MiMo-V2-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (400,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (100.0% vs 94.1%)
Higher BrowseComp score (65.8% vs 58.3%)
Higher GPQA score (92.4% vs 83.7%)
Higher HMMT 2025 score (99.4% vs 84.4%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (34.5% vs 22.1%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.0% vs 73.4%)
Xiaomi
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.2 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

GPT-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-5.2 is made by OpenAI and MiMo-V2-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-5.2 scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT 2025: 99.4%, Tau2 Telecom: 98.7%, Graphwalks BFS <128k: 94.0%, GPQA: 92.4%. MiMo-V2-Flash scores AIME 2025: 94.1%, Arena-Hard v2: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 84.9%, HMMT 2025: 84.4%, GPQA: 83.7%.
MiMo-V2-Flash is 17.5x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input and $14.00/M output via openai. MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via xiaomi.
GPT-5.2 supports 400K tokens and MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (400K vs 256K), input pricing ($1.75 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GPT-5.2 is developed by OpenAI and MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.