Model Comparison

GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3 VL 4B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

GPT-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is 14.8x cheaper per token.

Verdict: GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking — which is better?

GPT-5.2 (by OpenAI) and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GPT-5.2 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-R, GPQA, MMMU-Pro, ScreenSpot Pro, VideoMMMU), while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks. GPT-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is roughly 14.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-5.2 also accepts a larger context window (400,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GPT-5.2 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 6 of 6 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 400,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Choose Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking if…

  • cost matters — it's about 14.8x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

GPT-5.2 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-R, GPQA, MMMU-Pro, ScreenSpot Pro, VideoMMMU), while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.2 ($1.75/1M tokens) is 17.5x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.2 ($14.00/1M tokens) is 14.0x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.2 is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Input tokens$1.75
Output tokens$14.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.2 accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while GPT-5.2 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both GPT-5.2 and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.2 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.2 was released on 2025-12-11, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

GPT-5.2 is 3 months newer than Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking.

GPT-5.2

Dec 11, 2025

7 months ago

2mo newer
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-08-25, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.2's training data extends to 2025-08-25, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking's cutoff date.

GPT-5.2

Aug 2025

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Provider Availability

GPT-5.2 is available from OpenAI. Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is available from DeepInfra.

GPT-5.2

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $14.00/1M

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (400,000 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (100.0% vs 74.5%)
Higher CharXiv-R score (82.1% vs 50.3%)
Higher GPQA score (92.4% vs 64.1%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (79.5% vs 57.0%)
Higher ScreenSpot Pro score (86.3% vs 49.2%)
Higher VideoMMMU score (85.9% vs 69.4%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.2 and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.2
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking.

Which is better, GPT-5.2 or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

GPT-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-5.2 is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-5.2 compare to Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking in benchmarks?

GPT-5.2 scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT 2025: 99.4%, Tau2 Telecom: 98.7%, Graphwalks BFS <128k: 94.0%, GPQA: 92.4%. Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 94.2%, ScreenSpot: 92.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 86.7%, MMLU-Redux: 86.0%, AI2D: 84.9%.

Is GPT-5.2 cheaper than Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is 17.5x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input and $14.00/M output via openai. Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking costs $0.10/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.2 and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

GPT-5.2 supports 400K tokens and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.2 and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

Key differences include context window (400K vs 262K), input pricing ($1.75 vs $0.10/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.2 and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

GPT-5.2 is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.