Model Comparison

GPT-5.4 vs Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. GPT-5.4 is 1.8x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

GPT-5.4 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (BrowseComp, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Claude Opus 4.7 is better at 6 benchmarks (Finance Agent, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MCP Atlas, OSWorld-Verified, SWE-Bench Pro).

Claude Opus 4.7 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-5.4 costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.4 ($2.50/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 ($5.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.4 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 ($25.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.7 is more expensive than GPT-5.4.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.4
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerOpenAI
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.4
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus 4.7 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5.4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude Opus 4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-5.4

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude Opus 4.7

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.4 was released on 2026-03-05, while Claude Opus 4.7 was released on 2026-04-16.

Claude Opus 4.7 is 1 month newer than GPT-5.4.

GPT-5.4

Mar 5, 2026

1 months ago

Claude Opus 4.7

Apr 16, 2026

0 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT-5.4 is available from OpenAI. Claude Opus 4.7 is available from Anthropic.

GPT-5.4

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Claude Opus 4.7

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher BrowseComp score (82.7% vs 79.3%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (75.1% vs 69.4%)
Anthropic
Higher Finance Agent score (64.4% vs 56.0%)
Higher GPQA score (94.2% vs 92.8%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (54.7% vs 39.8%)
Higher MCP Atlas score (77.3% vs 67.2%)
Higher OSWorld-Verified score (78.0% vs 75.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (64.3% vs 57.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.4
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.4 vs Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. GPT-5.4 is made by OpenAI and Claude Opus 4.7 is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-5.4 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.9%, ARC-AGI: 93.7%, Graphwalks BFS <128k: 93.0%, GPQA: 92.8%, Graphwalks parents <128k: 89.8%. Claude Opus 4.7 scores GPQA: 94.2%, MMMLU: 91.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 87.6%, BrowseComp: 79.3%.
GPT-5.4 is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.4 costs $2.50/M input and $15.00/M output via openai. Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic.
GPT-5.4 supports 1.0M tokens and Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include input pricing ($2.50 vs $5.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GPT-5.4 is developed by OpenAI and Claude Opus 4.7 is developed by Anthropic.