Model Comparison

GPT-5.4 vs MAI-Code-1-Flash

GPT-5.4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

GPT-5.4 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (FrontierMath, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Pro, Tau2 Telecom, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MAI-Code-1-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-5.4 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only GPT-5.4 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-5.4
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1-Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-5.4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MAI-Code-1-Flash does not.

GPT-5.4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MAI-Code-1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-5.4

Proprietary

Closed source

MAI-Code-1-Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.4 was released on 2026-03-05, while MAI-Code-1-Flash was released on 2026-06-02.

MAI-Code-1-Flash is 3 months newer than GPT-5.4.

GPT-5.4

Mar 5, 2026

3 months ago

MAI-Code-1-Flash

Jun 2, 2026

4 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher FrontierMath score (47.6% vs 6.3%)
Higher GPQA score (92.8% vs 84.6%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (39.8% vs 18.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (57.7% vs 51.2%)
Higher Tau2 Telecom score (98.9% vs 71.7%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (75.1% vs 54.8%)
Microsoft

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.4
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1-Flash

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.4 vs MAI-Code-1-Flash.

Which is better, GPT-5.4 or MAI-Code-1-Flash?

GPT-5.4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-5.4 is made by OpenAI and MAI-Code-1-Flash is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-5.4 compare to MAI-Code-1-Flash in benchmarks?

GPT-5.4 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.9%, ARC-AGI: 93.7%, Graphwalks BFS <128k: 93.0%, GPQA: 92.8%, Graphwalks parents <128k: 89.8%. MAI-Code-1-Flash scores AIME 2026: 92.5%, GPQA: 84.6%, IFBench: 75.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 71.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 71.6%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.4 and MAI-Code-1-Flash?

GPT-5.4 supports 1.0M tokens and MAI-Code-1-Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.4 and MAI-Code-1-Flash?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.4 and MAI-Code-1-Flash?

GPT-5.4 is developed by OpenAI and MAI-Code-1-Flash is developed by Microsoft.