Model Comparison

GPT-5.4 vs Phi 4 MiniWhich is better in 2026?

GPT-5.4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: GPT-5.4 vs Phi 4 Mini — which is better?

GPT-5.4 (by OpenAI) and Phi 4 Mini (by Microsoft) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GPT-5.4 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Phi 4 Mini is better at 0 benchmarks. GPT-5.4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose GPT-5.4 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026

Choose Phi 4 Mini if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GPT-5.4 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Phi 4 Mini is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-5.4 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only GPT-5.4 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-5.4
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-5.4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Mini does not.

GPT-5.4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Mini uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.4

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Mini

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.4 was released on 2026-03-05, while Phi 4 Mini was released on 2025-02-01.

GPT-5.4 is 13 months newer than Phi 4 Mini.

GPT-5.4

Mar 5, 2026

3 months ago

1.1yr newer
Phi 4 Mini

Feb 1, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while GPT-5.4's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Mini's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT-5.4's cutoff date.

GPT-5.4

—

Phi 4 Mini

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (92.8% vs 25.2%)
Microsoft
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.4
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.4 vs Phi 4 Mini.

Which is better, GPT-5.4 or Phi 4 Mini?

GPT-5.4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-5.4 is made by OpenAI and Phi 4 Mini is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-5.4 compare to Phi 4 Mini in benchmarks?

GPT-5.4 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.9%, ARC-AGI: 93.7%, Graphwalks BFS <128k: 93.0%, GPQA: 92.8%, Graphwalks parents <128k: 89.8%. Phi 4 Mini scores GSM8k: 88.6%, ARC-C: 83.7%, BoolQ: 81.2%, OpenBookQA: 79.2%, PIQA: 77.6%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.4 and Phi 4 Mini?

GPT-5.4 supports 1.0M tokens and Phi 4 Mini supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.4 and Phi 4 Mini?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.4 and Phi 4 Mini?

GPT-5.4 is developed by OpenAI and Phi 4 Mini is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons