Make AI phone calls with one API call

Start for free

Model Comparison

GPT-5.4 vs Qwen3.6-27B

GPT-5.4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

GPT-5.4 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMU-Pro, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Qwen3.6-27B is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

CallingBox

Done comparing? Ship the phone agent.

One API for outbound and inbound calls.

Start for freeRead the docs
$0.05 /min all-in7 lines of code

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 23 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.4
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-27B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-5.4 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only GPT-5.4 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-5.4
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both GPT-5.4 and Qwen3.6-27B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5.4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.6-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.6-27B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.4

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.6-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.4 was released on 2026-03-05, while Qwen3.6-27B was released on 2026-04-21.

Qwen3.6-27B is 2 months newer than GPT-5.4.

GPT-5.4

Mar 5, 2026

1 months ago

Qwen3.6-27B

Apr 21, 2026

2 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (92.8% vs 87.8%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (39.8% vs 24.0%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (81.2% vs 75.8%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (57.7% vs 53.5%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (75.1% vs 59.3%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.6-27B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-27B

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.4 vs Qwen3.6-27B

GPT-5.4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-5.4 is made by OpenAI and Qwen3.6-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-5.4 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.9%, ARC-AGI: 93.7%, Graphwalks BFS <128k: 93.0%, GPQA: 92.8%, Graphwalks parents <128k: 89.8%. Qwen3.6-27B scores CountBench: 97.8%, VLMsAreBlind: 97.0%, V*: 94.7%, AIME 2026: 94.1%, HMMT 2025: 93.8%.
GPT-5.4 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.6-27B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GPT-5.4 is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3.6-27B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.