Model Comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT OSS 120BWhich is better in 2026?

GPT-5.6 Luna shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. GPT OSS 120B is 12.5x cheaper per token.

Verdict: GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT OSS 120B — which is better?

GPT-5.6 Luna (by OpenAI) and GPT OSS 120B (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GPT-5.6 Luna outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, HealthBench Hard), while GPT OSS 120B is better at 1 benchmark (HealthBench). GPT-5.6 Luna shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

On price, GPT OSS 120B is roughly 12.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-5.6 Luna also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose GPT OSS 120B if…

  • cost matters — it's about 12.5x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

GPT-5.6 Luna outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, HealthBench Hard), while GPT OSS 120B is better at 1 benchmark (HealthBench).

GPT-5.6 Luna shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Jul 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT OSS 120B costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.6 Luna ($1.00/1M tokens) is 11.1x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.09/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.6 Luna ($6.00/1M tokens) is 13.3x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.45/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.6 Luna is more expensive than GPT OSS 120B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Jul 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerOpenAI
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B
Input tokens$0.09
Output tokens$0.45
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.6 Luna accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to GPT OSS 120B's 131,072 tokens. GPT OSS 120B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GPT-5.6 Luna is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Jul 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-5.6 Luna supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT OSS 120B does not.

GPT-5.6 Luna can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.6 Luna

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT OSS 120B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.6 Luna is licensed under a proprietary license, while GPT OSS 120B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.6 Luna

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT OSS 120B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.6 Luna was released on 2026-07-09, while GPT OSS 120B was released on 2025-08-05.

GPT-5.6 Luna is 11 months newer than GPT OSS 120B.

GPT-5.6 Luna

Jul 9, 2026

2 weeks ago

11mo newer
GPT OSS 120B

Aug 5, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.6 Luna has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-16, while GPT OSS 120B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.6 Luna's training data extends to 2026-02-16, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT OSS 120B's cutoff date.

GPT-5.6 Luna

Feb 2026

GPT OSS 120B

—

Provider Availability

GPT-5.6 Luna is available from OpenAI. GPT OSS 120B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, OpenAI, Fireworks, Groq.

GPT-5.6 Luna

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M

GPT OSS 120B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.45/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (1,050,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (92.3% vs 80.1%)
Higher HealthBench Hard score (32.0% vs 30.0%)
OpenAI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher HealthBench score (57.6% vs 55.8%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.6 Luna and GPT OSS 120B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.6 Luna
✓ Preferred
GPT OSS 120B
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT OSS 120B.

Which is better, GPT-5.6 Luna or GPT OSS 120B?

GPT-5.6 Luna shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI and GPT OSS 120B is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-5.6 Luna compare to GPT OSS 120B in benchmarks?

GPT-5.6 Luna scores Connectors: 99.9%, HealthBench Consensus: 95.1%, GPQA: 92.3%, Search and Function-Calling: 89.7%, Capture-the-Flag Challenges (Internal): 85.2%. GPT OSS 120B scores MMLU: 90.0%, CodeForces: 82.1%, GPQA: 80.1%, TAU-bench Retail: 67.8%, HealthBench: 57.6%.

Is GPT-5.6 Luna cheaper than GPT OSS 120B?

GPT OSS 120B is 11.1x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna costs $1.00/M input and $6.00/M output via openai. GPT OSS 120B costs $0.09/M input and $0.45/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.6 Luna and GPT OSS 120B?

GPT-5.6 Luna supports 1.1M tokens and GPT OSS 120B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.6 Luna and GPT OSS 120B?

Key differences include context window (1.1M vs 131K), input pricing ($1.00 vs $0.09/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons