Model Comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Grok-2Which is better in 2026?

GPT-5.6 Luna significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-5.6 Luna is 1.8x cheaper per token.

Verdict: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Grok-2 — which is better?

GPT-5.6 Luna (by OpenAI) and Grok-2 (by xAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GPT-5.6 Luna outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Grok-2 is better at 0 benchmarks. GPT-5.6 Luna significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, GPT-5.6 Luna is roughly 1.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-5.6 Luna also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 1.8x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Grok-2 if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GPT-5.6 Luna outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Grok-2 is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5.6 Luna significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.6 Luna ($1.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Grok-2 ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.6 Luna ($6.00/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Grok-2 ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok-2 is more expensive than GPT-5.6 Luna.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerOpenAI
xAI
Grok-2
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.6 Luna accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Grok-2's 128,000 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Grok-2 is limited to 8,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok-2
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both GPT-5.6 Luna and Grok-2 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5.6 Luna

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-5.6 Luna

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-2

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.6 Luna was released on 2026-07-09, while Grok-2 was released on 2024-08-13.

GPT-5.6 Luna is 23 months newer than Grok-2.

GPT-5.6 Luna

Jul 9, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.9yr newer
Grok-2

Aug 13, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.6 Luna has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-16, while Grok-2's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.6 Luna's training data extends to 2026-02-16, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok-2's cutoff date.

GPT-5.6 Luna

Feb 2026

Grok-2

Provider Availability

GPT-5.6 Luna is available from OpenAI. Grok-2 is available from xAI.

GPT-5.6 Luna

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M

Grok-2

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,050,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (92.3% vs 56.0%)

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.6 Luna and Grok-2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.6 Luna
✓ Preferred
Grok-2
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna
xAI
Grok-2

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.6 Luna vs Grok-2.

Which is better, GPT-5.6 Luna or Grok-2?

GPT-5.6 Luna significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI and Grok-2 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-5.6 Luna compare to Grok-2 in benchmarks?

GPT-5.6 Luna scores Connectors: 99.9%, HealthBench Consensus: 95.1%, GPQA: 92.3%, Search and Function-Calling: 89.7%, Capture-the-Flag Challenges (Internal): 85.2%. Grok-2 scores DocVQA: 93.6%, HumanEval: 88.4%, MMLU: 87.5%, MATH: 76.1%, MMLU-Pro: 75.5%.

Is GPT-5.6 Luna cheaper than Grok-2?

GPT-5.6 Luna is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna costs $1.00/M input and $6.00/M output via openai. Grok-2 costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.6 Luna and Grok-2?

GPT-5.6 Luna supports 1.1M tokens and Grok-2 supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.6 Luna and Grok-2?

Key differences include context window (1.1M vs 128K), input pricing ($1.00 vs $2.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.6 Luna and Grok-2?

GPT-5.6 Luna is developed by OpenAI and Grok-2 is developed by xAI.