Model Comparison

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3-CoderWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3-Coder across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3-Coder — which is better?

GPT-5.6 Sol (by OpenAI) and Qwen3-Coder (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Qwen3-Coder is roughly 62.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-5.6 Sol also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GPT-5.6 Sol if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Qwen3-Coder if…

  • cost matters — it's about 62.5x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3-Coderdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-Coder costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.6 Sol ($5.00/1M tokens) is 27.8x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder ($0.18/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.6 Sol ($30.00/1M tokens) is 166.7x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.6 Sol is more expensive than Qwen3-Coder.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$30.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder
Input tokens$0.18
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.6 Sol accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3-Coder's 256,000 tokens. Qwen3-Coder can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while GPT-5.6 Sol is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-5.6 Sol supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder does not.

GPT-5.6 Sol can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.6 Sol

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-Coder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.6 Sol is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Coder uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.6 Sol

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-Coder

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.6 Sol was released on 2026-07-09, while Qwen3-Coder was released on 2025-01-01.

GPT-5.6 Sol is 18 months newer than Qwen3-Coder.

GPT-5.6 Sol

Jul 9, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.5yr newer
Qwen3-Coder

Jan 1, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.6 Sol has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-16, while Qwen3-Coder's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.6 Sol's training data extends to 2026-02-16, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Coder's cutoff date.

GPT-5.6 Sol

Feb 2026

Qwen3-Coder

Provider Availability

GPT-5.6 Sol is available from OpenAI. Qwen3-Coder is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks.

GPT-5.6 Sol

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M

Qwen3-Coder

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,050,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3-Coder

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3-Coder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.6 Sol
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-Coder
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3-Coder.

Which is better, GPT-5.6 Sol or Qwen3-Coder?

GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI) and Qwen3-Coder (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GPT-5.6 Sol compare to Qwen3-Coder in benchmarks?

GPT-5.6 Sol scores Connectors: 100.0%, Capture-the-Flag Challenges (Internal): 96.7%, HealthBench Consensus: 95.5%, GPQA: 94.6%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 91.5%.

Is GPT-5.6 Sol cheaper than Qwen3-Coder?

Qwen3-Coder is 27.8x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.6 Sol costs $5.00/M input and $30.00/M output via openai. Qwen3-Coder costs $0.18/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3-Coder?

GPT-5.6 Sol supports 1.1M tokens and Qwen3-Coder supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3-Coder?

Key differences include context window (1.1M vs 256K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.18/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3-Coder?

GPT-5.6 Sol is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3-Coder is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.