Model Comparison

GPT Image 2 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash ImageWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing GPT Image 2 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: GPT Image 2 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Image — which is better?

GPT Image 2 (by OpenAI) and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Gemini 3.1 Flash Image is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose GPT Image 2 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash Image if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per generated image

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image costs less

GPT Image 2 ($5.00/image) is 10.0x more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Flash Image ($0.50/image).

OpenAI
GPT Image 2
Per image$5.00
Best providerOpenAI
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash Image
Per image$0.50
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT Image 2

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT Image 2 was released on 2026-04-21, while Gemini 3.1 Flash Image was released on 2026-02-26.

GPT Image 2 is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.1 Flash Image.

GPT Image 2

Apr 21, 2026

1 months ago

1mo newer
Gemini 3.1 Flash Image

Feb 26, 2026

3 months ago

Provider Availability

GPT Image 2 is available from OpenAI. Gemini 3.1 Flash Image is available from Google.

GPT Image 2

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Google
Larger context window (65,536 tokens)
Less expensive per image

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT Image 2
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash Image

FAQ

Common questions about GPT Image 2 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Image.

Which is better, GPT Image 2 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Image?

GPT Image 2 (OpenAI) and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

Is GPT Image 2 cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Flash Image?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image is 10.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT Image 2 costs $5.00/M input and $30.00/M output via openai. Gemini 3.1 Flash Image costs $0.50/M input and $30.00/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for GPT Image 2 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image?

GPT Image 2 supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image supports 66K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT Image 2 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image?

Key differences include input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.50/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT Image 2 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image?

GPT Image 2 is developed by OpenAI and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image is developed by Google.

Related comparisons