Model Comparison
GPT OSS 120B High vs MiniMax M1 80KWhich is better in 2026?
GPT OSS 120B High shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. GPT OSS 120B High is 4.8x cheaper per token.
Verdict: GPT OSS 120B High vs MiniMax M1 80K — which is better?
GPT OSS 120B High (by OpenAI) and MiniMax M1 80K (by MiniMax) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
GPT OSS 120B High outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA), while MiniMax M1 80K is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU-Pro). GPT OSS 120B High shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
On price, GPT OSS 120B High is roughly 4.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
MiniMax M1 80K also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose GPT OSS 120B High if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 4.8x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025
Choose MiniMax M1 80K if…
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
GPT OSS 120B High outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA), while MiniMax M1 80K is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU-Pro).
GPT OSS 120B High shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, GPT OSS 120B High ($0.10/1M tokens) is 5.5x cheaper than MiniMax M1 80K ($0.55/1M tokens).
For output processing, GPT OSS 120B High ($0.50/1M tokens) is 4.4x cheaper than MiniMax M1 80K ($2.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, MiniMax M1 80K is more expensive than GPT OSS 120B High.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
MiniMax M1 80K has 339.2B more parameters than GPT OSS 120B High, making it 290.4% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
MiniMax M1 80K accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GPT OSS 120B High's 131,072 tokens. GPT OSS 120B High can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while MiniMax M1 80K is limited to 40,000 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
GPT OSS 120B High is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MiniMax M1 80K uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
GPT OSS 120B High was released on 2025-08-05, while MiniMax M1 80K was released on 2025-06-16.
GPT OSS 120B High is 2 months newer than MiniMax M1 80K.
Aug 5, 2025
11 months ago
1mo newerJun 16, 2025
1.1 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
GPT OSS 120B High is available from OpenAI, Fireworks. MiniMax M1 80K is available from Novita.
GPT OSS 120B High
MiniMax M1 80K
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
MiniMax M1 80K
View detailsMiniMax
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against GPT OSS 120B High and MiniMax M1 80K side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about GPT OSS 120B High vs MiniMax M1 80K.