Model Comparison

GPT OSS 120B High vs Qwen3 32B

GPT OSS 120B High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 32B is 1.3x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GPT OSS 120B High outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2025), while Qwen3 32B is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT OSS 120B High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jun 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 32B costs less

For input processing, GPT OSS 120B High ($0.10/1M tokens) costs the same as Qwen3 32B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT OSS 120B High ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Qwen3 32B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT OSS 120B High is more expensive than Qwen3 32B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jun 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

84.0B diff

GPT OSS 120B High has 84.0B more parameters than Qwen3 32B, making it 256.1% larger.

OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
116.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
32.8Bparameters
116.8B
GPT OSS 120B High
32.8B
Qwen3 32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT OSS 120B High accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Qwen3 32B's 128,000 tokens. GPT OSS 120B High can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Qwen3 32B is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Jun 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

GPT OSS 120B High

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT OSS 120B High was released on 2025-08-05, while Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29.

GPT OSS 120B High is 3 months newer than Qwen3 32B.

GPT OSS 120B High

Aug 5, 2025

10 months ago

3mo newer
Qwen3 32B

Apr 29, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT OSS 120B High is available from OpenAI, Fireworks. Qwen3 32B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Sambanova.

GPT OSS 120B High

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Qwen3 32B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (92.5% vs 72.9%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B

FAQ

Common questions about GPT OSS 120B High vs Qwen3 32B.

Which is better, GPT OSS 120B High or Qwen3 32B?

GPT OSS 120B High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT OSS 120B High is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT OSS 120B High compare to Qwen3 32B in benchmarks?

GPT OSS 120B High scores AIME 2025: 92.5%, MMMLU: 83.8%, LiveCodeBench v6: 81.9%, GPQA: 80.9%, MMLU-Pro: 80.7%. Qwen3 32B scores Arena Hard: 93.8%, AIME 2024: 81.4%, LiveBench: 74.9%, MultiLF: 73.0%, AIME 2025: 72.9%.

Is GPT OSS 120B High cheaper than Qwen3 32B?

Both models cost $0.10 per million input tokens.

What are the context window sizes for GPT OSS 120B High and Qwen3 32B?

GPT OSS 120B High supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 32B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT OSS 120B High and Qwen3 32B?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 128K). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT OSS 120B High and Qwen3 32B?

GPT OSS 120B High is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.