Model Comparison

GPT OSS 120B High vs Qwen3 VL 32B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

GPT OSS 120B High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: GPT OSS 120B High vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct — which is better?

GPT OSS 120B High (by OpenAI) and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GPT OSS 120B High outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench v6, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks. GPT OSS 120B High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose GPT OSS 120B High if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

GPT OSS 120B High outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench v6, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT OSS 120B High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Jun 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

83.8B diff

GPT OSS 120B High has 83.8B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct, making it 253.9% larger.

OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
116.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
33.0Bparameters
116.8B
GPT OSS 120B High
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT OSS 120B High specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only GPT OSS 120B High specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Jun 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT OSS 120B High does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT OSS 120B High

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

GPT OSS 120B High

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT OSS 120B High was released on 2025-08-05, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 2 months newer than GPT OSS 120B High.

GPT OSS 120B High

Aug 5, 2025

10 months ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

9 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (92.5% vs 66.2%)
Higher GPQA score (80.9% vs 68.9%)
Higher LiveCodeBench v6 score (81.9% vs 43.8%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (80.7% vs 78.6%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about GPT OSS 120B High vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT OSS 120B High or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

GPT OSS 120B High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT OSS 120B High is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT OSS 120B High compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT OSS 120B High scores AIME 2025: 92.5%, MMMLU: 83.8%, LiveCodeBench v6: 81.9%, GPQA: 80.9%, MMLU-Pro: 80.7%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT OSS 120B High and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

GPT OSS 120B High supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT OSS 120B High and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT OSS 120B High and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

GPT OSS 120B High is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.