The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

GPT OSS 120B leads the LLM Stats Score 28.3 to 4.8.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT OSS 120B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 28.3 to 4.8, ranking #167 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT OSS 120B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT OSS 120B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 28.3 and ranks #167 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
28.3
#167
4.8
#337
22.5
#202
0.9
#352
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.04 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.17 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT OSS 120B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
23.1#146
4.8#300
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for GPT OSS 120B · 45 for Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

1 shared

GPT OSS 120B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Nov 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

109.8B diff

GPT OSS 120B has 109.8B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B, making it 1568.6% larger.

OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B
116.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
7.0Bparameters
116.8B
GPT OSS 120B
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT OSS 120B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only GPT OSS 120B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Nov 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT OSS 120B does not.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT OSS 120B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

GPT OSS 120B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT OSS 120B was released on 2025-08-05, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

GPT OSS 120B is 4 months newer than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

GPT OSS 120B

Aug 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

4mo newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT OSS 120B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT OSS 120B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, GPT OSS 120B or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

GPT OSS 120B leads the LLM Stats Score 28.3 to 4.8. GPT OSS 120B is made by OpenAI and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT OSS 120B compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

GPT OSS 120B scores MMLU: 90.0%, CodeForces: 82.1%, GPQA: 80.1%, TAU-bench Retail: 67.8%, HealthBench: 57.6%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT OSS 120B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

GPT OSS 120B supports 131K tokens and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT OSS 120B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (28.3 vs 4.8), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT OSS 120B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

GPT OSS 120B is developed by OpenAI and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.