Model Comparison

Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Llama 4 ScoutWhich is better in 2026?

Llama 4 Scout significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Llama 4 Scout — which is better?

Granite 3.3 8B Base (by IBM) and Llama 4 Scout (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Granite 3.3 8B Base outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 4 Scout is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU). Llama 4 Scout significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Base if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

Choose Llama 4 Scout if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Granite 3.3 8B Base outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 4 Scout is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

Llama 4 Scout significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

100.8B diff

Llama 4 Scout has 100.8B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Base, making it 1234.1% larger.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
8.2Bparameters
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
8.2B
Granite 3.3 8B Base
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Scout specifies input context (10,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Scout specifies output context (10,000,000 tokens).

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Granite 3.3 8B Base and Llama 4 Scout support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Granite 3.3 8B Base is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Granite 3.3 8B Base was released on 2025-04-16, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

Granite 3.3 8B Base is 0 month newer than Llama 4 Scout.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 16, 2025

1.3 years ago

1w newer
Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Base has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Base's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 2024

Llama 4 Scout

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

IBM

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Meta
Larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
Higher MMLU score (79.6% vs 63.9%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Granite 3.3 8B Base and Llama 4 Scout side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Granite 3.3 8B Base
✓ Preferred
Llama 4 Scout
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Meta
Llama 4 Scout

FAQ

Common questions about Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Llama 4 Scout.

Which is better, Granite 3.3 8B Base or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Granite 3.3 8B Base is made by IBM and Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Granite 3.3 8B Base compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

Granite 3.3 8B Base scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, HellaSwag: 80.1%. Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Granite 3.3 8B Base and Llama 4 Scout?

Granite 3.3 8B Base supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Granite 3.3 8B Base and Llama 4 Scout?

Key differences include licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Granite 3.3 8B Base and Llama 4 Scout?

Granite 3.3 8B Base is developed by IBM and Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons