Model Comparison

Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Phi 4 Reasoning

Phi 4 Reasoning shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Granite 3.3 8B Base outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2024), while Phi 4 Reasoning is better at 3 benchmarks (Arena Hard, HumanEval+, IFEval).

Phi 4 Reasoning shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

5.8B diff

Phi 4 Reasoning has 5.8B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Base, making it 71.4% larger.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
8.2Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
14.0Bparameters
8.2B
Granite 3.3 8B Base
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Granite 3.3 8B Base supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning does not.

Granite 3.3 8B Base can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Granite 3.3 8B Base is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Phi 4 Reasoning uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Phi 4 Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Granite 3.3 8B Base was released on 2025-04-16, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

Phi 4 Reasoning is 0 month newer than Granite 3.3 8B Base.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 16, 2025

1.0 years ago

Phi 4 Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.0 years ago

2w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Base has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Phi 4 Reasoning has a cutoff of 2025-03-01.

Phi 4 Reasoning has more recent training data (up to 2025-03-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Granite 3.3 8B Base (2024-04-01).

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 2024

Phi 4 Reasoning

Mar 2025

11 mo newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

IBM
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2024 score (81.2% vs 75.3%)
Microsoft
Higher Arena Hard score (73.3% vs 57.6%)
Higher HumanEval+ score (92.9% vs 86.1%)
Higher IFEval score (83.4% vs 74.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning

FAQ

Common questions about Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Phi 4 Reasoning

Phi 4 Reasoning shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Granite 3.3 8B Base is made by IBM and Phi 4 Reasoning is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Granite 3.3 8B Base scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, HellaSwag: 80.1%. Phi 4 Reasoning scores FlenQA: 97.7%, HumanEval+: 92.9%, IFEval: 83.4%, OmniMath: 76.6%, AIME 2024: 75.3%.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Granite 3.3 8B Base is developed by IBM and Phi 4 Reasoning is developed by Microsoft.