Model Comparison

Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Granite 3.3 8B Base has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Granite 3.3 8B Base outperforms in 4 benchmarks (HellaSwag, HumanEval, TruthfulQA, Winogrande), while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (ARC-C, GSM8k, MMLU).

Granite 3.3 8B Base has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.2B diff

Granite 3.3 8B Base has 1.2B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct, making it 16.7% larger.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
8.2Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
7.0Bparameters
8.2B
Granite 3.3 8B Base
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Granite 3.3 8B Base supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct does not.

Granite 3.3 8B Base can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Granite 3.3 8B Base was released on 2025-04-16, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Granite 3.3 8B Base is 7 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 16, 2025

1.0 years ago

6mo newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Base has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Base's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 2024

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher HellaSwag score (80.1% vs 76.8%)
Higher HumanEval score (89.7% vs 88.4%)
Higher TruthfulQA score (52.1% vs 50.6%)
Higher Winogrande score (74.4% vs 72.9%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher ARC-C score (60.9% vs 50.8%)
Higher GSM8k score (83.9% vs 59.0%)
Higher MMLU score (67.6% vs 63.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Granite 3.3 8B Base has a slight edge in benchmark performance. Granite 3.3 8B Base is made by IBM and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Granite 3.3 8B Base scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, HellaSwag: 80.1%. Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, GSM8k: 83.9%, MBPP: 83.5%, HellaSwag: 76.8%, Winogrande: 72.9%.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Granite 3.3 8B Base is developed by IBM and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.