The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Granite 3.3 8B Base outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (IFEval, MMLU). Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Base

  • you are already invested in the IBM ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.99 / M
Context window
131,072
Released
Apr 2025
Sep 2025
License
Apache 2.0
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Granite 3.3 8B Base outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (IFEval, MMLU).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

22.8B diff

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has 22.8B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Base, making it 279.4% larger.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
8.2Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
31.0Bparameters
8.2B
Granite 3.3 8B Base
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Granite 3.3 8B Base and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Granite 3.3 8B Base was released on 2025-04-16, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 5 months newer than Granite 3.3 8B Base.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Base has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Base's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's cutoff date.

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 2024

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Granite 3.3 8B Base and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Granite 3.3 8B Base
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Which is better, Granite 3.3 8B Base or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Granite 3.3 8B Base is made by IBM and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Granite 3.3 8B Base compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in benchmarks?

Granite 3.3 8B Base scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, HellaSwag: 80.1%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Granite 3.3 8B Base and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Granite 3.3 8B Base supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Granite 3.3 8B Base and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Granite 3.3 8B Base is developed by IBM and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.