Model Comparison

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 235B A22B is 5.0x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 235B A22B is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2024, Arena Hard, GSM8k, MMLU).

Qwen3 235B A22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B costs less

For input processing, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Qwen3 235B A22B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Qwen3 235B A22B ($0.10/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is more expensive than Qwen3 235B A22B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerReplicate
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

227.0B diff

Qwen3 235B A22B has 227.0B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct, making it 2837.5% larger.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
8.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
235.0Bparameters
8.0B
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
235.0B
Qwen3 235B A22B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 235B A22B does not.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 235B A22B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was released on 2025-04-16, while Qwen3 235B A22B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 235B A22B is 0 month newer than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 16, 2025

1.0 years ago

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apr 29, 2025

11 months ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Qwen3 235B A22B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 235B A22B's cutoff date.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 2024

Qwen3 235B A22B

Provider Availability

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is available from Replicate. Qwen3 235B A22B is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra, Novita, Together.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

replicate logo
Replicate
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Qwen3 235B A22B

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 235B A22B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher AIME 2024 score (85.7% vs 81.2%)
Higher Arena Hard score (95.6% vs 57.6%)
Higher GSM8k score (94.4% vs 80.9%)
Higher MMLU score (87.8% vs 65.5%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B

FAQ

Common questions about Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is made by IBM and Qwen3 235B A22B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, GSM8k: 80.9%. Qwen3 235B A22B scores Arena Hard: 95.6%, GSM8k: 94.4%, BBH: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.8%, MMLU-Redux: 87.4%.
Qwen3 235B A22B is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs $0.50/M input and $0.50/M output via replicate. Qwen3 235B A22B costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output via fireworks.
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 235B A22B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is developed by IBM and Qwen3 235B A22B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.