Model Comparison

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 1.3x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (IFEval, MMLU).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs less

For input processing, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.99/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerReplicate
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.99
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

23.0B diff

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has 23.0B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct, making it 287.5% larger.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
8.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
31.0Bparameters
8.0B
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking can generate longer responses up to 32,768 tokens, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was released on 2025-04-16, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 5 months newer than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 16, 2025

1.0 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

7 months ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's cutoff date.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 2024

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Provider Availability

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is available from Replicate. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is available from Novita, DeepInfra.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

replicate logo
Replicate
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.29/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.99/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive output tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Higher IFEval score (81.7% vs 74.8%)
Higher MMLU score (87.6% vs 65.5%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is made by IBM and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, GSM8k: 80.9%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.6%.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs $0.50/M input and $0.50/M output via replicate. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs $0.20/M input and $0.99/M output via novita.
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (128K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.20/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is developed by IBM and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.