The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-4 vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

GPT-4 leads the LLM Stats Score 3.7 to -4.9.

OpenAI · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-4 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 3.7 to -4.9, ranking #288 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-4 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-4

  • overall performance matters — it scores 3.7 and ranks #288 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
3.7
#288
-4.9
#336
3.7
#280
-4.9
#327
-5.1
#242
3.0
#205
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$30.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$60.00 / M
— / M
Context window
32,768

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-4
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
8.8#244
-5.3#302
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for GPT-4 · 12 for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

3 shared

GPT-4 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (DROP, MMLU), while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is better at 1 benchmark (HumanEval).

GPT-4 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4 specifies input context (32,768 tokens). Only GPT-4 specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-4
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

GPT-4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4 was released on 2023-06-13, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 23 months newer than GPT-4.

GPT-4

Jun 13, 2023

3.2 years ago

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.3 years ago

1.9yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2022-12-31, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4's training data extends to 2022-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date.

GPT-4

Dec 2022

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-4 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-4
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4 vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, GPT-4 or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

GPT-4 leads the LLM Stats Score 3.7 to -4.9. GPT-4 is made by OpenAI and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-4 compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

GPT-4 scores AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC): 96.3%, HellaSwag: 95.3%, Uniform Bar Exam: 90.0%, SAT Math: 89.0%, LSAT: 88.0%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

GPT-4 supports 33K tokens and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.7 vs -4.9), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

GPT-4 is developed by OpenAI and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.