Model Comparison

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Llama 3.2 11B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct — which is better?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview (by IBM) and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU). Llama 3.2 11B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Choose Llama 3.2 11B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Jul 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

3.6B diff

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has 3.6B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 51.4% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
10.6Bparameters
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
10.6B
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mon Jul 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct uses Llama 3.2 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.2 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 7 months newer than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.2 years ago

7mo newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.2 11B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher MMLU score (73.0% vs 60.4%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview compare to Llama 3.2 11B Instruct in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct scores AI2D: 91.1%, DocVQA: 88.4%, ChartQA: 83.4%, VQAv2 (test): 75.2%, MMLU: 73.0%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Llama 3.2 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is developed by Meta.