Model Comparison

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HumanEval+, TruthfulQA), while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MMLU).

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Wed Apr 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 29 2026 • llm-stats.com
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

25.5B diff

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 25.5B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 364.3% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
32.5Bparameters
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
32.5B
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 8 months newer than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

12 months ago

7mo newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

IBM
Higher HumanEval+ score (78.3% vs 52.4%)
Higher TruthfulQA score (58.1% vs 57.8%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher GSM8k score (95.9% vs 70.1%)
Higher HumanEval score (88.4% vs 82.4%)
Higher MMLU score (83.3% vs 60.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has a slight edge in benchmark performance. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.9%, HumanEval: 88.4%, HellaSwag: 85.2%, BBH: 84.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.