Model Comparison

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (Arena Hard, GSM8k, HumanEval, IFEval).

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Apr 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Apr 11 2026 • llm-stats.com
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

610.0M diff

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 0.6B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 8.7% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
7.6Bparameters
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.6B
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Sat Apr 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 8 months newer than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

11 months ago

7mo newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Higher Arena Hard score (52.0% vs 26.7%)
Higher GSM8k score (91.6% vs 70.1%)
Higher HumanEval score (84.8% vs 82.4%)
Higher IFEval score (71.2% vs 63.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.6%, MT-Bench: 87.5%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MBPP: 79.2%, MATH: 75.5%.
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.