The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-1.5 vs Pixtral-12B

Grok-1.5 and Pixtral-12B are closely matched at -2.6 and -1.6 on the LLM Stats Score.

xAI · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok-1.5 and Pixtral-12B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -2.6 and -1.6.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Grok-1.5 wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-1.5

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 6 exact shared results

Choose Pixtral-12B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-2.6
#339
-1.6
#335
-2.2
#329
-3.8
#337
-0.9
#245
-2.6
#249
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 6
2 of 6
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Grok-1.5
Pixtral-12B
4.9#276
1.0#295
-5.2#201
0.1#180
-2.6#160
3.8#140
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Grok-1.5 · 12 for Pixtral-12B

6 shared

Grok-1.5 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (HumanEval, MATH, MMLU, MMMU), while Pixtral-12B is better at 2 benchmarks (DocVQA, MathVista).

Grok-1.5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Pixtral-12B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Pixtral-12B specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

xAI
Grok-1.5
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Pixtral-12B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok-1.5 does not.

Pixtral-12B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Pixtral-12B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-1.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Pixtral-12B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Pixtral-12B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-1.5 was released on 2024-03-28, while Pixtral-12B was released on 2024-09-17.

Pixtral-12B is 6 months newer than Grok-1.5.

Grok-1.5

Mar 28, 2024

2.5 years ago

Pixtral-12B

Sep 17, 2024

2.0 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-1.5 and Pixtral-12B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-1.5
✓ Preferred
Pixtral-12B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-1.5 vs Pixtral-12B.

Which is better, Grok-1.5 or Pixtral-12B?

Grok-1.5 and Pixtral-12B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -2.6 and -1.6. Grok-1.5 is made by xAI and Pixtral-12B is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok-1.5 compare to Pixtral-12B in benchmarks?

Grok-1.5 scores GSM8k: 90.0%, DocVQA: 85.6%, MMLU: 81.3%, HumanEval: 74.1%, MMMU: 53.6%. Pixtral-12B scores DocVQA: 90.7%, ChartQA: 81.8%, VQAv2: 78.6%, MT-Bench: 76.8%, HumanEval: 72.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-1.5 and Pixtral-12B?

Grok-1.5 supports an unknown number of tokens and Pixtral-12B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-1.5 and Pixtral-12B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-2.6 vs -1.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-1.5 and Pixtral-12B?

Grok-1.5 is developed by xAI and Pixtral-12B is developed by Mistral AI.