Grok-1.5 vs Pixtral-12B Comparison
Comparing Grok-1.5 and Pixtral-12B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Grok-1.5 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (HumanEval, MATH, MMLU, MMMU), while Pixtral-12B is better at 2 benchmarks (DocVQA, MathVista).
Grok-1.5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Pixtral-12B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Pixtral-12B specifies output context (8,192 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Pixtral-12B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok-1.5 does not.
Pixtral-12B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Grok-1.5
Pixtral-12B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Grok-1.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Pixtral-12B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Grok-1.5 was released on 2024-03-28, while Pixtral-12B was released on 2024-09-17.
Pixtral-12B is 6 months newer than Grok-1.5.
Mar 28, 2024
2.0 years ago
Sep 17, 2024
1.5 years ago
5mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Pixtral-12B
View detailsMistral AI
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|