The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-1.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B

Qwen3.5-2B leads the LLM Stats Score 3.8 to -2.6.

xAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.5-2B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 3.8 to -2.6, ranking #304 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.5-2B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-1.5

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.5-2B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 3.8 and ranks #304 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-2.6
#339
3.8
#304
-2.2
#329
5.4
#292
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Grok-1.5
Qwen3.5-2B
4.9#276
3.6#287
4.7#174
3.5#178
4.7#158
3.5#167
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Grok-1.5 · 20 for Qwen3.5-2B

2 shared

Grok-1.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.5-2B is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen3.5-2B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.5-2B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok-1.5 does not.

Qwen3.5-2B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-1.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-2B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.5-2B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-1.5 was released on 2024-03-28, while Qwen3.5-2B was released on 2026-03-02.

Qwen3.5-2B is 23 months newer than Grok-1.5.

Grok-1.5

Mar 28, 2024

2.5 years ago

Qwen3.5-2B

Mar 2, 2026

6 months ago

1.9yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-1.5 and Qwen3.5-2B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-1.5
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.5-2B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-1.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B.

Which is better, Grok-1.5 or Qwen3.5-2B?

Qwen3.5-2B leads the LLM Stats Score 3.8 to -2.6. Grok-1.5 is made by xAI and Qwen3.5-2B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok-1.5 compare to Qwen3.5-2B in benchmarks?

Grok-1.5 scores GSM8k: 90.0%, DocVQA: 85.6%, MMLU: 81.3%, HumanEval: 74.1%, MMMU: 53.6%. Qwen3.5-2B scores MMLU-Redux: 79.6%, IFEval: 78.6%, C-Eval: 73.2%, Global PIQA: 69.3%, MMLU-Pro: 66.5%.

What are the main differences between Grok-1.5 and Qwen3.5-2B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-2.6 vs 3.8), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-1.5 and Qwen3.5-2B?

Grok-1.5 is developed by xAI and Qwen3.5-2B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.