Model Comparison

Grok-3 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is 34.3x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Grok-3 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B costs less

For input processing, Grok-3 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok-3 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 37.5x more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok-3 is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok-3
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerxAI
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Grok-3 is limited to 8,000 tokens.

xAI
Grok-3
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok-3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B does not.

Grok-3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-3 is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-3

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-3 was released on 2025-02-17, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B was released on 2025-01-20.

Grok-3 is 1 month newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.

Grok-3

Feb 17, 2025

1.2 years ago

4w newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Jan 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-3's training data extends to 2024-11-17, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B's cutoff date.

Grok-3

Nov 2024

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Provider Availability

Grok-3 is available from xAI. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is available from DeepInfra.

Grok-3

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2024 score (93.3% vs 86.7%)
Higher GPQA score (84.6% vs 65.2%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (79.4% vs 57.5%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
xAIGrok-3
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-3
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-3 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.

Which is better, Grok-3 or DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B?

Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Grok-3 is made by xAI and DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Grok-3 compare to DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B in benchmarks?

Grok-3 scores AIME 2024: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 93.3%, GPQA: 84.6%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, MMMU: 78.0%. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B scores MATH-500: 94.5%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 65.2%, LiveCodeBench: 57.5%.

Is Grok-3 cheaper than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is 30.0x cheaper for input tokens. Grok-3 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via xai. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-3 and DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B?

Grok-3 supports 128K tokens and DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-3 and DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B?

Key differences include input pricing ($3.00 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-3 and DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B?

Grok-3 is developed by xAI and DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is developed by DeepSeek.