Model Comparison

Grok-3 vs DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

Grok-3 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is 19.0x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Grok-3 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA), while DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is better at 1 benchmark (LiveCodeBench).

Grok-3 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri May 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) costs less

For input processing, Grok-3 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 10.7x more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) ($0.28/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok-3 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 35.7x more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) ($0.42/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok-3 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri May 29 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok-3
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerxAI
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$0.42
Best providerDeepSeek
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Grok-3's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Grok-3 is limited to 8,000 tokens.

xAI
Grok-3
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)
Input131,072 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Fri May 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok-3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) does not.

Grok-3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-3 is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-3

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-3 was released on 2025-02-17, while DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) was released on 2025-12-01.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is 10 months newer than Grok-3.

Grok-3

Feb 17, 2025

1.3 years ago

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

Dec 1, 2025

5 months ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-3's training data extends to 2024-11-17, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)'s cutoff date.

Grok-3

Nov 2024

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

Provider Availability

Grok-3 is available from xAI. DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is available from DeepSeek.

Grok-3

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.42/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (93.3% vs 93.1%)
Higher GPQA score (84.6% vs 82.4%)
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher LiveCodeBench score (83.3% vs 79.4%)
xAIGrok-3
DeepSeekDeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-3
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-3 vs DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking).

Which is better, Grok-3 or DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)?

Grok-3 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Grok-3 is made by xAI and DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Grok-3 compare to DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) in benchmarks?

Grok-3 scores AIME 2024: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 93.3%, GPQA: 84.6%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, MMMU: 78.0%. DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) scores AIME 2025: 93.1%, HMMT 2025: 90.2%, MMLU-Pro: 85.0%, LiveCodeBench: 83.3%, GPQA: 82.4%.

Is Grok-3 cheaper than DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)?

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is 10.7x cheaper for input tokens. Grok-3 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via xai. DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) costs $0.28/M input and $0.42/M output via deepseek.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-3 and DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)?

Grok-3 supports 128K tokens and DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-3 and DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 131K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $0.28/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-3 and DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)?

Grok-3 is developed by xAI and DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is developed by DeepSeek.