Grok-3 vs QwQ-32B Comparison
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Grok-3 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while QwQ-32B is better at 0 benchmarks.
Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Grok-3 specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Grok-3 specifies output context (8,000 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Grok-3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.
Grok-3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Grok-3
QwQ-32B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Grok-3 is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Grok-3 was released on 2025-02-17, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.
QwQ-32B is 1 month newer than Grok-3.
Feb 17, 2025
1.1 years ago
Mar 5, 2025
1.0 years ago
2w newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok-3 has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while QwQ-32B has a cutoff of 2024-11-28.
QwQ-32B has more recent training data (up to 2024-11-28), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Grok-3 (2024-11-17).
Nov 2024
Nov 2024
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
QwQ-32B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Grok-3
QwQ-32B