Model Comparison

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs Muse Spark 1.1Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Muse Spark 1.1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is better?

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning (by xAI) and Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is roughly 7.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning also accepts a larger context window (2,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning if…

  • cost matters — it's about 7.3x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 2,000,000 token context window

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Muse Spark 1.1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning costs less

For input processing, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning ($0.20/1M tokens) is 6.3x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning ($0.50/1M tokens) is 8.5x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerxAI
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning accepts 2,000,000 input tokens compared to Muse Spark 1.1's 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is limited to 30,000 tokens.

xAI
Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning
Input2,000,000 tokens
Output30,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning was released on 2025-11-17, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 8 months newer than Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning.

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

Nov 17, 2025

8 months ago

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

2 weeks ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is available from xAI. Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API.

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Muse Spark 1.1

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

xAI
Larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Meta

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning or Muse Spark 1.1?

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning (xAI) and Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

Is Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1?

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is 6.3x cheaper for input tokens. Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning costs $0.20/M input and $0.50/M output via xai. Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Muse Spark 1.1?

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning supports 2.0M tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Muse Spark 1.1?

Key differences include context window (2.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.20 vs $1.25/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Muse Spark 1.1?

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is developed by xAI and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons