Model Comparison

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs Qwen3 32B

Comparing Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Qwen3 32B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Qwen3 32B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 32B costs less

For input processing, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning ($0.20/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Qwen3 32B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Qwen3 32B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is more expensive than Qwen3 32B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

Input tokens$0.20

Output tokens$0.50

Best providerxAI

Qwen3 32B

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning accepts 2,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 32B's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 32B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is limited to 30,000 tokens.

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

Input2,000,000 tokens

Output30,000 tokens

Qwen3 32B

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 32B does not.

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 32B

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning was released on 2025-11-17, while Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29.

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is 7 months newer than Qwen3 32B.

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

Nov 17, 2025

6 months ago

6mo newer

Qwen3 32B

Apr 29, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is available from xAI. Qwen3 32B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Sambanova.

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

xAI

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Qwen3 32B

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M

Sambanova

Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

View details

xAI

Larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Qwen3 32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning	Qwen3 32B

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs Qwen3 32B.

Which is better, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning or Qwen3 32B?

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning (xAI) and Qwen3 32B (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning compare to Qwen3 32B in benchmarks?

Qwen3 32B scores Arena Hard: 93.8%, AIME 2024: 81.4%, LiveBench: 74.9%, MultiLF: 73.0%, AIME 2025: 72.9%.

Is Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning cheaper than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning costs $0.20/M input and $0.50/M output via xai. Qwen3 32B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Qwen3 32B?

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning supports 2.0M tokens and Qwen3 32B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Qwen3 32B?

Key differences include context window (2.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($0.20 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Qwen3 32B?

Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is developed by xAI and Qwen3 32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.