Model Comparison

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning vs QwQ-32B-Preview

Comparing Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning and QwQ-32B-Preview across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning and QwQ-32B-Preview don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

QwQ-32B-Preview costs less

For input processing, Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning ($0.20/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning is more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerxAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning accepts 2,000,000 input tokens compared to QwQ-32B-Preview's 32,768 tokens. QwQ-32B-Preview can generate longer responses up to 32,768 tokens, while Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning is limited to 30,000 tokens.

xAI
Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning
Input2,000,000 tokens
Output30,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B-Preview does not.

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B-Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B-Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning was released on 2025-08-28, while QwQ-32B-Preview was released on 2024-11-28.

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning is 9 months newer than QwQ-32B-Preview.

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning

Aug 28, 2025

7 months ago

9mo newer
QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 28, 2024

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B-Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B-Preview's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning's cutoff date.

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning

QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 2024

Provider Availability

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning is available from xAI. QwQ-32B-Preview is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together.

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

QwQ-32B-Preview

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

QwQ-32B-Preview

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning vs QwQ-32B-Preview

Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning (xAI) and QwQ-32B-Preview (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
QwQ-32B-Preview scores MATH-500: 90.6%, GPQA: 65.2%, AIME 2024: 50.0%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%.
QwQ-32B-Preview is 1.3x cheaper for input tokens. Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning costs $0.20/M input and $0.50/M output via xai. QwQ-32B-Preview costs $0.15/M input and $0.20/M output via deepinfra.
Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning supports 2.0M tokens and QwQ-32B-Preview supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (2.0M vs 33K), input pricing ($0.20 vs $0.15/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning is developed by xAI and QwQ-32B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.