Model Comparison
Grok-4 Heavy vs Qwen3 32B
Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Grok-4 Heavy outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, LiveCodeBench), while Qwen3 32B is better at 0 benchmarks.
Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Qwen3 32B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen3 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Grok-4 Heavy supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 32B does not.
Grok-4 Heavy can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Grok-4 Heavy
Qwen3 32B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Grok-4 Heavy is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 32B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29, while Grok-4 Heavy's release date is not specified.
We can confirm Qwen3 32B's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Grok-4 Heavy's release date.
—
Apr 29, 2025
1.1 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok-4 Heavy has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while Qwen3 32B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Grok-4 Heavy's training data extends to 2024-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 32B's cutoff date.
Dec 2024
—
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 32B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Grok-4 Heavy vs Qwen3 32B.