Model Comparison

Grok-4 Heavy vs Qwen3 VL 4B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Grok-4 Heavy vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking — which is better?

Grok-4 Heavy (by xAI) and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Grok-4 Heavy outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, HMMT25), while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks. Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Grok-4 Heavy if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks

Choose Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Grok-4 Heavy outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, HMMT25), while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.

Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

xAI
Grok-4 Heavy
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Grok-4 Heavy and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok-4 Heavy

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-4 Heavy is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-4 Heavy

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22, while Grok-4 Heavy's release date is not specified.

We can confirm Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Grok-4 Heavy's release date.

Grok-4 Heavy

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-4 Heavy has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-4 Heavy's training data extends to 2024-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking's cutoff date.

Grok-4 Heavy

Dec 2024

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher AIME 2025 score (100.0% vs 74.5%)
Higher GPQA score (88.4% vs 64.1%)
Higher HMMT25 score (96.7% vs 53.1%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-4 Heavy and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-4 Heavy
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-4 Heavy vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking.

Which is better, Grok-4 Heavy or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Grok-4 Heavy is made by xAI and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Grok-4 Heavy compare to Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking in benchmarks?

Grok-4 Heavy scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT25: 96.7%, GPQA: 88.4%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, USAMO25: 61.9%. Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 94.2%, ScreenSpot: 92.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 86.7%, MMLU-Redux: 86.0%, AI2D: 84.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-4 Heavy and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

Grok-4 Heavy supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-4 Heavy and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-4 Heavy and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

Grok-4 Heavy is developed by xAI and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.