Model Comparison
Grok-4 Heavy vs QwQ-32B
Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Grok-4 Heavy outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while QwQ-32B is better at 0 benchmarks.
Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Grok-4 Heavy supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.
Grok-4 Heavy can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Grok-4 Heavy
QwQ-32B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Grok-4 Heavy is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05, while Grok-4 Heavy's release date is not specified.
We can confirm QwQ-32B's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Grok-4 Heavy's release date.
—
Mar 5, 2025
1.2 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok-4 Heavy has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while QwQ-32B has a cutoff of 2024-11-28.
Grok-4 Heavy has more recent training data (up to 2024-12-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to QwQ-32B (2024-11-28).
Dec 2024
1 mo newerNov 2024
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
QwQ-32B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |  |  |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Grok-4 Heavy vs QwQ-32B.