Model Comparison
Grok-4 vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Grok-4 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.
Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Grok-4 specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Grok-4 specifies output context (8,000 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Grok-4 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Grok-4
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Grok-4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Grok-4 was released on 2025-07-09, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-02-28.
Grok-4 is 4 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.
Jul 9, 2025
9 months ago
4mo newerFeb 28, 2025
1.1 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Grok-4's training data extends to 2024-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date.
Dec 2024
—
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Grok-4
Qwen2.5 VL 32B InstructDetailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Grok-4 vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct