Model Comparison

Grok-4 vs QwQ-32B

Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Grok-4 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while QwQ-32B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok-4
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerxAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok-4 specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Grok-4 specifies output context (8,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok-4
Input256,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok-4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.

Grok-4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-4

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-4 was released on 2025-07-09, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

Grok-4 is 4 months newer than QwQ-32B.

Grok-4

Jul 9, 2025

9 months ago

4mo newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-4 has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while QwQ-32B has a cutoff of 2024-11-28.

Grok-4 has more recent training data (up to 2024-12-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to QwQ-32B (2024-11-28).

Grok-4

Dec 2024

1 mo newer
QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

xAI
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (87.5% vs 65.2%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (79.0% vs 63.4%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

QwQ-32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights
xAIGrok-4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwQ-32B
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-4 vs QwQ-32B

Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Grok-4 is made by xAI and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Grok-4 scores AIME 2025: 91.7%, HMMT25: 90.0%, GPQA: 87.5%, LiveCodeBench: 79.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 40.0%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.
Grok-4 supports 256K tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Grok-4 is developed by xAI and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.