Model Comparison

Grok-4 vs QwQ-32B-Preview

Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. QwQ-32B-Preview is 36.9x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Grok-4 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while QwQ-32B-Preview is better at 0 benchmarks.

Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

QwQ-32B-Preview costs less

For input processing, Grok-4 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok-4 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 75.0x more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok-4 is more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok-4
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerxAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok-4 accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to QwQ-32B-Preview's 32,768 tokens. QwQ-32B-Preview can generate longer responses up to 32,768 tokens, while Grok-4 is limited to 8,000 tokens.

xAI
Grok-4
Input256,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok-4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B-Preview does not.

Grok-4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B-Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-4

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B-Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-4 was released on 2025-07-09, while QwQ-32B-Preview was released on 2024-11-28.

Grok-4 is 7 months newer than QwQ-32B-Preview.

Grok-4

Jul 9, 2025

9 months ago

7mo newer
QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 28, 2024

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-4 has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while QwQ-32B-Preview has a cutoff of 2024-11-28.

Grok-4 has more recent training data (up to 2024-12-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to QwQ-32B-Preview (2024-11-28).

Grok-4

Dec 2024

1 mo newer
QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 2024

Provider Availability

Grok-4 is available from xAI. QwQ-32B-Preview is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together.

Grok-4

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

QwQ-32B-Preview

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

xAI
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (87.5% vs 65.2%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (79.0% vs 50.0%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

QwQ-32B-Preview

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
xAIGrok-4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwQ-32B-Preview
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-4 vs QwQ-32B-Preview

Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Grok-4 is made by xAI and QwQ-32B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Grok-4 scores AIME 2025: 91.7%, HMMT25: 90.0%, GPQA: 87.5%, LiveCodeBench: 79.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 40.0%. QwQ-32B-Preview scores MATH-500: 90.6%, GPQA: 65.2%, AIME 2024: 50.0%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%.
QwQ-32B-Preview is 20.0x cheaper for input tokens. Grok-4 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via xai. QwQ-32B-Preview costs $0.15/M input and $0.20/M output via deepinfra.
Grok-4 supports 256K tokens and QwQ-32B-Preview supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (256K vs 33K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $0.15/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Grok-4 is developed by xAI and QwQ-32B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.