Model Comparison

Grok-4.1 vs QwQ-32BWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing Grok-4.1 and QwQ-32B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Grok-4.1 vs QwQ-32B — which is better?

Grok-4.1 (by xAI) and QwQ-32B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Grok-4.1 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2025

Choose QwQ-32B if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Grok-4.1 and QwQ-32Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok-4.1 specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Grok-4.1 specifies output context (8,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok-4.1
Input256,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok-4.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.

Grok-4.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-4.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok-4.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok-4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-4.1 was released on 2025-11-17, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

Grok-4.1 is 9 months newer than QwQ-32B.

Grok-4.1

Nov 17, 2025

8 months ago

8mo newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Grok-4.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok-4.1's cutoff date.

Grok-4.1

—

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

xAI
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

QwQ-32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-4.1 and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-4.1
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok-4.1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-4.1 vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, Grok-4.1 or QwQ-32B?

Grok-4.1 (xAI) and QwQ-32B (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Grok-4.1 compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

Grok-4.1 scores FActScore: 97.0%, Creative Writing v3: 85.4%, EQ-Bench: 79.3%, LMArena Text Leaderboard: 73.3%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-4.1 and QwQ-32B?

Grok-4.1 supports 256K tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-4.1 and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-4.1 and QwQ-32B?

Grok-4.1 is developed by xAI and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons