Model Comparison
Grok 4.5 vs MiMo-V2-FlashWhich is better in 2026?
Grok 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Flash is 20.0x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Grok 4.5 vs MiMo-V2-Flash — which is better?
Grok 4.5 (by xAI) and MiMo-V2-Flash (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Grok 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks. Grok 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, MiMo-V2-Flash is roughly 20.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Grok 4.5 also accepts a larger context window (500,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Grok 4.5 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 500,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
Choose MiMo-V2-Flash if…
- cost matters — it's about 20.0x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Grok 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.
Grok 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Grok 4.5 ($2.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Grok 4.5 ($6.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Grok 4.5 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Grok 4.5 accepts 500,000 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's 256,000 tokens. Only MiMo-V2-Flash specifies output context (16,384 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Grok 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.
Grok 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Grok 4.5
MiMo-V2-Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
Grok 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Grok 4.5 was released on 2026-07-16, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.
Grok 4.5 is 7 months newer than MiMo-V2-Flash.
Jul 16, 2026
5 days ago
7mo newerDec 16, 2025
7 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-01, while MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Grok 4.5's training data extends to 2026-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date.
Feb 2026
—
Provider Availability
Grok 4.5 is available from xAI. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi.
Grok 4.5
MiMo-V2-Flash
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Grok 4.5 and MiMo-V2-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Grok 4.5 vs MiMo-V2-Flash.